Differences in behavior, time, location, and built environment between objectively measured utilitarian and recreational walking

Data were collected 2008–2009 from 651 Seattle-King County residents, wearing an accelerometer and a GPS unit, and filling-in a travel diary for 7 days. Walking activity bouts were classified as utilitarian or recreational based on whether walking had a destination or not. Differences between the two walking purposes were analyzed, adjusting for the nested structure of walking activity within participants.

Of the 4905 observed walking bouts, 87.4% were utilitarian and 12.6% recreational walking. Utilitarian walking bouts were 45% shorter in duration (−12.1 min) and 9% faster in speed (+0.3 km/h) than recreational walking bouts. Recreational walking occurred more frequently in the home neighborhood and was not associated with recreational land uses. Utilitarian walking occurred in areas having higher residential, employment, and street density, lower residential property value, higher area percentage of mixed-use neighborhood destinations, lower percentage of parks/trails, and lower average topographic slope than recreational walking.

Utilitarian and recreational walking are substantially different in terms of frequency, speed, duration, location, and related built environment. Policies that promote walking should adopt type-specific strategies. The high occurrence of recreational walking near home highlights the importance of the home neighborhood for this activity.

Bumjoon Kang, Assistant Professor
Department of Urban and Regional Planning

Anne V. Moudon
Philip M. Hurvitz
Urban Form Lab and the Department of Urban Design and Planning, University of Washington

Brian E. Saelensc
Seattle Children’s Research Institute and Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Child Health, Behavior and Development

Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment

2017